Change to read:
Elastomeric closures for containers used in the types of preparations defined in the general test chapter Injections 1
are made of materials obtained by vulcanization (crosslinking) polymerization, polyaddition, or polycondensation of macromolecular organic substances (elastomers). Closure formulations contain natural or synthetic elastomers and inorganic and organic additives to aid or control vulcanization, impart physical and chemical properties or color, or stabilize the closure formulation.
This chapter applies to closures formulated with natural or synthetic elastomeric substances. This chapter does not apply to closures made from silicone elastomer; however, it does apply to closures treated with silicone (e.g., Dimethicone, NF). When performing the tests in this chapter, it is not required that closures be treated with silicone, although there is no restriction prohibiting the use of siliconized closures.
The following comments relate solely to laminated or coated closures (e.g., PTFE or lacquer coatings). All Physicochemical Tests apply to the base elastomer of such closures. To obtain Physicochemical Tests results, the tests may be performed on uncoated or nonlaminated closures of the same elastomeric compound. The Functionality Tests apply to and are to be performed using the entire laminated or coated elastomeric closure. Biological Tests apply to both the lamination or coating material and to the base elastomer. Biological Tests may be performed on the coating separately from the base elastomer, or on the coated closure itself. For all of the tests in the chapter performed on any closure type, it is important to document the closure being tested, including a full description of the elastomer, and any lubrication, coating, laminations, or treatments applied.
This chapter states test limits for Type I and Type II elastomeric closures. Type I closures are those used for aqueous preparations. Type II closures are typically intended for nonaqueous preparations and are those which, having properties optimized for special uses, may not meet all requirements listed for Type I closures because of physical configuration, material of construction, or both. If a closure fails to meet one or more of the Type I test requirements, but still meets the Type II requirements for the test(s), the closure is assigned a final classification of Type II.
This chapter is intended as an initial screen to identify elastomeric closures that might be appropriate for use with injectable preparations on the basis of their biological compatibility, their aqueous extract physicochemical properties, and their functionality. All elastomeric closures suitable for use with injectable preparations comply with either Type I or Type II test limits. However, this specification is not intended to serve as the sole evaluation criteria for the selection of such closures.
The following closure evaluation requirements are beyond the scope of this chapter:
The establishment of closure identification tests and specifications
The verification of closureproduct physicochemical compatibility
The identification and safety determination of closure leachables found in the packaged product
The verification of packaged product closure functionality under actual storage and use conditions
The manufacturer of the injectable product (the end user) must obtain from the closure supplier an assurance that the composition of the closure does not vary and that it is the same as that of the closure used during compatibility testing. When the supplier informs the end user of changes in the composition, compatibility testing must be repeated, totally or partly, depending on the nature of the changes. Closures must be properly stored, cleaned for removal of environmental contaminants and endotoxins, and sterilized prior to use in packaging injectable products.
Closures are made of a wide variety of elastomeric materials and optional polymeric coatings. For this reason, it is beyond the scope of this chapter to specify identification tests that encompass all possible closure presentations. However, it is the responsibility of the closure supplier and the injectable product manufacturer (the end user) to verify the closure elastomeric formulation and any coating or laminate materials used according to suitable identification tests. Examples of some of the analytical test methodologies that may be used include specific gravity, percentage of ash analysis, sulfur content determination, FTIR-ATR test, thin-layer chromatography of an extract, UV absorption spectrophotometry of an extract, or IR absorption spectrophotometry of a pyrolysate.
Elastomeric closures shall conform to biological, physicochemical, and functionality requirements both as they are shipped by the closure supplier to the injectable product manufacturer (the end user), and in their final ready-to-use state by the end user.
For those elastomeric closures processed by the supplier prior to distribution to the end user, the supplier shall demonstrate compendial conformance of closures exposed to such processing and/or sterilization steps. Similarly, if elastomeric closures received by the end user are subsequently processed or sterilized, the end user is responsible for demonstrating the continued conformance of closures to compendial requirements subsequent to such processing and/or sterilization conditions (i.e., in their ready-to-use state). This is especially important if closures shall be exposed to processes or conditions that may significantly impact the biological, physicochemical, or functionality characteristics of the closure (e.g., gamma irradiation).
For closures that are normally lubricated (for example, siliconized) prior to use, it is permissible to perform physicochemical testing on nonlubricated closures in order to avoid potential method interference and/or difficulties in interpreting test results.
For laminated or coated closures (e.g., PTFE or lacquer coatings), physicochemical compendial tests apply to the noncoated base elastomer. In this case, suppliers are responsible for demonstrating physicochemical compendial compliance of the noncoated closure processed or treated in a manner simulating those conditions followed for coated closures prior to shipment to the end user. End users of coated closures are also responsible for demonstrating the continued physicochemical compendial conformance of the base, uncoated elastomer subsequent to processing or sterilization, in a manner simulating the end user's actual use conditions for the coated closures.
In all cases, it is appropriate to document all conditions of closure processing, pretreatment, sterilization or lubrication when reporting test results.
Preparation of Solution S
Place whole, uncut closures corresponding to a surface area of 100 ± 10 cm2 into a suitable glass container. Cover the closures with 200 mL of Purified Water or Water for Injection. If it is not possible to achieve the prescribed closure surface area (100±10 cm2) using uncut closures, select the number of closures that will most closely approximate 100 cm2, and adjust the volume of water used to the equivalent of 2 mL per each 1 cm2 of actual closure surface area used. Boil for 5 minutes, and rinse five times with cold Purified Water or Water for Injection
Place the washed closures into a Type I glass wide-necked flask (see ContainersGlass 660
), add the same quantity of Purified Water or Water for Injection initially added to the closures, and weigh. Cover the mouth of the flask with a Type I glass beaker. Heat in an autoclave so that a temperature of 121 ± 2
C is reached within 20 to 30 minutes, and maintain this temperature for 30 minutes. Cool to room temperature over a period of about 30 minutes. Add Purified Water or Water for Injection to bring it up to the original mass. Shake, and immediately decant and collect the solution. [note
This solution must be shaken before being used in each of the tests.]
Preparation of Blank
Prepare a blank solution similarly, using 200 mL of Purified Water or Water for Injection omitting the closures.
Appearance of Solution (Turbidity/Opalescence and Color)
Determination of Turbidity (Opalescence)
The determination of turbidity may be performed by visual comparison (Procedure A
), or instrumentally using a suitable ratio turbidimeter (Procedure B
). For a discussion of turbidimetry, see Spectrophotometry and Light-Scattering 851
. Instrumental assessment of clarity provides a more discriminatory test that does not depend on the visual acuity of the analyst.
Hydrazine Sulfate Solution
Dissolve 1.0 g of hydrazine sulfate, in water and dilute with water to 100.0 mL. Allow to stand for 4 to 6 hours.
Dissolve 2.5 g of hexmethylenetetramine in 25.0 mL of water in a 100 mL glassstoppered flask.
Opalescence Stock Suspension
Add 25.0 mL of Hydrazine Sulfate Solution to the Hexamethylenetetramine Solution in the flask. Mix, and allow to stand for 24 hours. This suspension is stable for 2 months, provided it is stored in a glass container free from surface defects. The suspension must not adhere to the glass and must be well mixed before use.
Opalescence Standard Suspension
Prepare a suspension by diluting 15.0 mL of the Opalescence Stock Suspension with water to 1000.0 mL. Opalescence Standard Suspension is stable for about 24 hours after preparation.
Prepare according to Table 1
. Mix and shake before use. [note
Stabilized formazin suspensions that can be used to prepare stable, diluted turbidity standards are available commercially and may be used after comparison with the standards prepared as described.]
||Reference Suspension A
||Reference Suspension B
||Reference Suspension C
||Reference Suspension D
|Standard of Opalescence
|Nephelometric turbidity units
Procedure A: Visual Comparison
Use identical test tubes made of colorless, transparent, neutral glass with a flat base and an internal diameter of 15 to 25 mm. Fill one tube to a depth of 40 mm with Solution S,
one tube to the same depth with water, and four others to the same depth with Reference Suspensions A, B, C,
. Compare the solutions in diffuse daylight 5 minutes after preparation of the Reference Suspensions,
viewing vertically against a black background. The light conditions shall be such that Reference Suspension A
can be readily distinguished from water and that Reference Suspension B
can be readily distinguished from Reference Suspension A
is not more opalescent than Reference Suspension B
for Type I closures, and not more opalescent than Reference Suspension C
for Type II closures. Solution S
is considered clear if its clarity is the same as that of water when examined as described above, or if its opalescence is not more pronounced than that of Reference Suspension A
(refer to Table 2
Procedure B: Instrumental Comparison
Measure the turbidity of the Reference Suspensions
in a suitable calibrated turbidimeter (see Spectrophotometry and Light Scattering 851
). The blank should be run and the results corrected for the blank. Reference Suspensions A, B, C,
represent 3, 6, 18 and 30 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU), respectively. Measure the turbidity of Solution S
using the calibrated turbidimeter.
The turbidity of Solution S
is not greater than that for Reference Suspension B
(6 NTU FTU) for Type I closures, and is not greater than that for Reference Suspension C
(18 NTU FTU) for Type II closures (refer to Table 2
||Procedure A (Visual)
||Procedure B (Instrumental)
|Type I closures
||no more opalescent that Suspension B
||no more than 6 NTU
|Type II closures
||no more opalescent than Suspension C
||no more than 18 NTU
Determination of Color
Prepare a solution by diluting 6.0 mL of Matching Fluid O
(see Color and Achromicity 631
) with 94.0 mL of diluted hydrochloric acid.
Use identical tubes made of colorless, transparent, neutral glass with a flat base and an internal diameter of 15 to 25 mm. Fill one tube to a depth of 40 mm with Solution S, and the second with Color Standard. Compare the liquids in diffuse daylight, viewing vertically against a white background.
Solution S is not more intensely colored than the Color Standard
Acidity or Alkalinity
Bromothymol Blue Solution
Dissolve 50 mg of bromothymol blue in a mixture of 4 mL of 0.02 M sodium hydroxide and 20 mL of alcohol. Dilute with water to 100 mL.
To 20 ml of Solution S add 0.1 ml of Bromothymol Blue Solution. If the solution is yellow, titrate with 0.01 N sodium hydroxide until a blue endpoint is reached. If the solution is blue, titrate with 0.01 N hydrochloric acid until a yellow endpoint is reached. If the solution is green, it is neutral and no titration is required.
Test 20 mL of Blank
similarly. Correct the results obtained for Solution S
by subtracting the volume of titrant required for the Blank
. (Reference Titrimetry 541
Not more than 0.3 ml of 0.01 N sodium hydroxide produces a blue color, or not more than 0.8 ml of 0.01 N hydrochloric acid produces a yellow color, or no titration is required.
[notePerform this test within 5 hours of preparing Solution S.] Filter Solution S through a 0.45-µm pore size filter, discarding the first few mL of filtrate. Measure the absorbance of the filtrate at wavelengths between 220 and 360 nm in a 1-cm cell using the blank in a matched cell in the reference beam. If dilution of the filtrate is required before measurement of the absorbance, correct the test results for the dilution.
The absorbances at these wavelengths do not exceed 0.2 for Type I closures or 4.0 for Type II closures.
[notePerform this test within 4 hours of preparing Solution S.]
To 20.0 mL of Solution S add 1 mL of diluted sulfuric acid and 20.0 mL of 0.002 M potassium permanganate. Boil for 3 minutes. Cool, add 1 g of potassium iodide, and titrate immediately with 0.01 M sodium thiosulfate, using 0.25 mL of starch solution TS as the indicator. Perform a titration using 20.0 mL of blank and note the difference in volume of 0.01 M sodium thiosulfate required.
The difference between the titration volumes is not greater than 3.0 mL for Type I closures and not greater than 7.0 mL for Type II closures.
Proceed as directed for Method 1
under Heavy Metals 231.
Prepare the Test Preparation
using 10.0 mL of Solution S
Solution S contains not more than 2 ppm of heavy metals as lead.
Prepare a Test Solution by diluting 10.0 mL of Solution S to 100 mL with 0.1N hydrochloric acid. Prepare a test blank similarly, using the Blank for Solution S.
Zinc Standard Solution
Prepare a solution (10 ppm Zn) by dissolving zinc sulfate in 0.1 N hydrochloric acid.
Prepare not fewer than 3 Reference Solutions by diluting the Zinc Standard Solution with 0.1 N hydrochloric acid. The concentrations of zinc in these Reference Solutions are to span the expected limit of the Test Solution.
Use a suitable atomic absorption spectrophotometer (see Spectrophotometry and Light Scattering 851
) equipped with a zinc hollow-cathode lamp and an airacetylene flame. An alternative procedure such as an appropriately validated inductively coupled plasma analysis (ICP) may be used.
Test each of the Reference Solutions at the zinc emission line of 213.9 nm at least 3 times. Record the steady readings. Rinse the apparatus with the test blank solution each time, to ensure that the reading returns to initial blank value. Prepare a calibration curve from the mean of the readings obtained for each Reference Solution. Record the absorbance of the Test Solution. Determine the ppm zinc concentration of the Test Solution using the calibration curve.
Solution S contains not more than 5 ppm of extractable zinc.
Alkaline Potassium Tetraiodomercurate Solution
Prepare a 100 mL solution containing 11 g of potassium iodide and 15 g of mercuric iodide in water. Immediately before use, mix 1 volume of this solution with an equal volume of a 250 g per L solution of sodium hydroxide.
Dilute 5 mL of Solution S to 14 mL with water. Make alkaline if necessary by adding 1 N sodium hydroxide, and dilute with water to 15 mL. Add 0.3 mL of Alkaline Potassium Tetraiodomercurate Solution, and close the container.
Ammonium Standard Solution
Prepare a solution of ammonium chloride in water (1 ppm NH4). Mix 10 mL of the 1 ppm ammonium chloride solution with 5 mL water and 0.3 mL of Alkaline Potassium Tetraiodomercurate Solution. Close the container.
After 5 minutes, any yellow color in the Test Solution is no darker than the Ammonium Standard Solution (no more than 2 ppm of NH4 in Solution S).
Place closures, cut if necessary, with a total surface area of 20 ± 2 cm2
in a 100-mL flask, and add 50 mL of a 20 g per L citric acid solution. In the same manner and at the same time, prepare a control solution in a separate 100-mL flask by dissolving 0.154 mg of sodium sulfide in 50 mL of a 20 g per L citric acid solution. Place a piece of lead acetate paper over the mouth of each flask, and hold the paper in position by placing over it an inverted weighing bottle. Heat the flasks in an autoclave at 121 ± 2
for 30 minutes.
Any black stain on the paper produced by Solution S is not more intense than that produced by the control solution.
Samples treated as described for preparation of Solution S
and air dried should be used for Functionality Tests
of Penetrability, Fragmentation,
and Self-Sealing Capacity. Functionality Tests
are performed on closures intended to be pierced by a hypodermic needle. The Self-Sealing Capacity
test is required only for closures intended for multiple-dose containers. The needle specified for each test is a lubricated long bevel (bevel angle 12 ± 2
) hypodermic needle1
Fill 10 suitable vials to the nominal volume with water, fit the closures to be examined, and secure with a cap. Using a new hypodermic needle as described above for each closure, pierce the closure with the needle perpendicular to the surface.
The force for piercing is no greater than 10 N (1 kgf) for each closure, determined with an accuracy of ± 0.25 N (25 gf).
Closures for Liquid Preparations
Fill 12 clean vials with water to 4 mL less than the nominal capacity. Fit the closures to be examined, secure with a cap, and allow to stand for 16 hours.
Closures for Dry Preparations
Fit closures to be examined into 12 clean vials, and secure each with a cap.
Using a hypodermic needle as described above fitted to a clean syringe, inject into each vial 1 mL of water while removing 1 mL of air. Repeat this procedure 4 times for each closure, piercing each time at a different site. Use a new needle for each closure, checking that it is not blunted during the test. Filter the total volume of liquid in all the vials through a single filter with a nominal pore size no greater than 0.5 µm. Count the rubber fragments on the surface of the filter visible to the naked eye.
There are no more than 5 fragments visible. This limit is based on the assumption that fragments with a diameter >50 µm are visible to the naked eye. In case of doubt or dispute, the particles are examined microscopically to verify their nature and size.
Fill 10 suitable vials with water to the nominal volume. Fit the closures that are to be examined, and cap. Using a new hypodermic needle as described above for each closure, pierce each closure 10 times, piercing each time at a different site. Immerse the 10 vials in a solution of 0.1% (1 g per L) methylene blue, and reduce the external pressure by 27 kPa for 10 minutes. Restore to atmospheric pressure, and leave the vials immersed for 30 minutes. Rinse the outside of the vials.
None of the vials contain any trace of blue solution.